 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Home / Treatment With ORLUS / Tx
planning surgical procedure |
|
|
| |
5.
Indirect Approach
An indirect approach is needed for sites in which a direct approach
is impossible; these sites include the palatal area or buccal areas between
molars.
Required instruments for indirect approach
In order to use an indirect approach, a contra-angled instrument
is required (figure 29, 30). Requirements
of contra-angled instruments for performing a procedure using an
indirect approach are as follows.
| - |
Sufficient torque should be generated for insertion. |
| - |
Insertion speed can be controlled. To minimize surgical trauma,
the number of rotations for insertion should not exceed 60 RPM.
For perforating through cortical bone, approximately 60 ~ 120 RPM
is appropriate, and for insertion, approximately 30 RPM is adequate.
|
| - |
In an indirect approach, accessibility is low. Therefore,
instruments should be simple and easy to use.
For this purpose, an engine for prosthodontic implants or an
1:256 deceleration handpiece for a low speed engine is appropriate.
Furthermore, an endodontic engine may be used, but this instrument
can rarely generate sufficient torque. A 1:125 deceleration
handpiece for a low speed engine has excessive rpm and does
an inadequate job of minimizing surgical trauma.
A periodontal probe is essential for marking the insertion point
on soft tissue and for bone probing (figure 30). |
Fig. 29
A 1:256 deceleration handpiece for a low speed engine is recommended.
Fig. 30
Required instruments for the indirect approach. For implantation in the palatal
alveolus, a short driver tip is required. For implantation in the midpalatal
suture area, a long driver tip is required.
Surgical procedure for indirect approach to palatal alveolus (figure
31)
1. Pre-op examination stage
2. Preparation & marking stage
3. Perforating stage
4. Guiding stage
5. Finishing stage

| 1. |
Pre-op exam I & infiltration anesthesia
The insertion site should be examined thoroughly by inspection,
palpation and panoramic radiograph. And then, infiltration anesthesia
is administered on the palatal mucosa. |
| |
|
| 2. |
Pre-op exam II & marking stage
After the placement area is scrubbed with Betadine, bone probing
is performed to evaluate bone quality using a periodontal probe.
If bone appears to be soft and is easily penetrated with a probe,
the site of insertion should be changed. Surface topography
should be established by palpation to determine the insertion
angle
The thickness of soft tissue at the insertion point should be
also measured beforehand using a periodontal probe. The implant
should be chosen according to the thickness of the soft tissue.
If the gingival thickness of the planned position is too thick,
the insertion position should be changed.
Then, the insertion site should be marked with the periodontal
probe. Using a periodontal probe, the vertical reference line
which bisects the interdental area parallel to the axes of the
proximal teeth should be marked. The horizontal reference line
should then be marked according to the position of the alveolar
crest and the required amount of vertical force.
A separate incision is usually not required. |
| |
|
| 3. |
Perforating stage
The ORLUS mini-implant has the structure to be inserted without
pre-drilling, but pre-drilling with the ORLUS Surgical drill is designed
to perforate cortical bone and to prevent root injuries.
To avoid slippage, the operator should work perpendicular to
cortical bone during perforating through cortical bone. The
moment of perforation can be felt when resistance drastically
decreases. During perforating into cortical bone, a minimal
amount of vertical force should be applied to prevent unnecessary
tissue injuries. Operations should be performed by virtue of
the function of the screw, rather than by vertical force. About
120 rpm is appropriate for perforating into cortical bone under
flowing saline cooling. Appropriate cooling is needed to minimize
damage due to the heat generated during the insertion procedure. |
| |
|
| 4. |
Guiding stage: let the screw hold osseous
tissue according to the planned implantation angle.
After perforation of cortical bone, an implant should be inserted
up to about 2/3 of the full length according to the planned
angle of insertion. During this stage, minimal vertical force
should be applied as long as the insertion angle is maintained.
In order to avoid root structures and to increase the cortical
bone contact area, the insertion angle against the occlusal
plane should be approximately 30-45 degrees. As in the perforating
stage, the implant should be inserted by virtue of the screw
function, not by vertical force. That is, it should be inserted
by the turning action of hand-piece.
About 30 rpm is appropriate for the guiding stage under flowing
saline cooling. |
| |
|
| 5. |
Finishing stage: finish with maximal
support from cortical bone because the insertion path is established
through the recapitulation procedure.
After inserting approximately 2/3 of the full length of the
screw and securing its bone engagement, implant placement should
be finished with only rotational motion in order to maximize
support from cortical bone (figure 32). Because the screw engages
with bone, rotational motion is enough to finish the procedure
since the screw will transform this rotation into the required
translation. Forces in any direction can cause wobbling and
compromise intimate contact between bone and implant. |
Fig. 32
A firm rest should be secured when using a manual contra-angled
long driver. This rest should be obtained from the patients face
to apply the rotational force only, especially in the final stage
of the insertion for the prevention of wobbling.
|
|
|
 |